{"id":1550,"date":"2016-06-11T09:11:59","date_gmt":"2016-06-11T14:11:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/danielcooperlawyer.com\/?p=1550"},"modified":"2023-07-11T13:24:11","modified_gmt":"2023-07-11T13:24:11","slug":"family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/","title":{"rendered":"R.P. v. R.C., [2011] 3 SCR 819, 2011 SCC 65 (CanLII)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Question en litige<\/strong>: Dans quelles conditions est-ce qu\u2019une d\u00e9cision ant\u00e9rieure de la Cour pour pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9e? \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/fpdd9\">D\u00e9cision compl\u00e8te<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Les faits<\/strong> : Les parties ont \u00e9t\u00e9 mari\u00e9es 26 ans.\u00a0 En 1991, apr\u00e8s que les enfants ne r\u00e9sidaient plus avec l\u2019\u00e9pouse, le mari fut ordonn\u00e9 \u00e0 payer une pension alimentaire index\u00e9e de 2 000 $ par mois.\u00a0 En 2006, il a pris sa retraite et a vendu la maison o\u00f9 lui et sa seconde \u00e9pouse ont v\u00e9cu, r\u00e9alisant une somme de 2 million de dollars.\u00a0 En 2008, il d\u00e9pose une requ\u00eate pour mettre fin \u00e0 la pension alimentaire bas\u00e9e sur le fait qu\u2019il n\u2019avait plus de revenu d\u2019emploi, que le ralentissement du march\u00e9 a eu un impact n\u00e9gatif sur ses actifs et qu\u2019il avait un fils \u00e0 l\u2019universit\u00e9.\u00a0 Le juge de premi\u00e8re instance a r\u00e9duit le soutien \u00e0 1 500 $ par mois, non index\u00e9e.\u00a0 La Cour d\u2019appel du Qu\u00e9bec a ordonn\u00e9 que la pension alimentaire soit r\u00e9duit progressivement et que les paiements se terminent en septembre 2010.\u00a0 L\u2019\u00e9pouse a fait appel \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame.<\/p>\n<p><strong>D\u00e9cision<\/strong>\u00a0: La Cour Supr\u00eame du Canada a statu\u00e9 que la partie qui demande une modification doit \u00e9tablir qu\u2019il est survenu un changement de situation important depuis la d\u00e9cision ant\u00e9rieure. \u00a0Un changement important est un changement qui, s\u2019il avait \u00e9t\u00e9 connu \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9poque, se serait vraisemblablement traduit par des dispositions diff\u00e9rentes dans l\u2019ordonnance existante. Le mari a \u00e9t\u00e9 requis d\u2019identifier le changement invoqu\u00e9 et de fournir des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve suffisants pour permettre \u00e0 un tribunal de d\u00e9cider si un changement important dans sa situation avait en fait eu lieu depuis la d\u00e9cision de l&rsquo;ordonnance de 1991. Depuis, il n\u2019a produit aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment de preuve pour une ordonnance de modification, sa demande a \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9e. La Cour a r\u00e9tabli l&rsquo;ordonnance de 1991 \u00e0 verser une pension alimentaire index\u00e9e de 2000 $ par mois.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Question en litige: Dans quelles conditions est-ce qu\u2019une d\u00e9cision ant\u00e9rieure de la Cour pour pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9e?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1550","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-droit-de-la-famille-cat","category-pension-epoux-cat"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Droit de la famille - Kramer v Kramer<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Droit de la famille - Kramer v Kramer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Question en litige: Dans quelles conditions est-ce qu\u2019une d\u00e9cision ant\u00e9rieure de la Cour pour pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9e?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Alice Florian Avocate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-11T14:11:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-11T13:24:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daniel Cooper\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daniel Cooper\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Daniel Cooper\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d\"},\"headline\":\"R.P. v. R.C., [2011] 3 SCR 819, 2011 SCC 65 (CanLII)\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-11T14:11:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-11T13:24:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":342,\"articleSection\":[\"Droit de la famille\",\"Pension \u00e9poux\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Droit de la famille - Kramer v Kramer\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-11T14:11:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-11T13:24:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R.P. v. R.C., [2011] 3 SCR 819, 2011 SCC 65 (CanLII)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Alice Florian Avocate\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d\",\"name\":\"Daniel Cooper\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Daniel Cooper\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Droit de la famille - Kramer v Kramer","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Droit de la famille - Kramer v Kramer","og_description":"Question en litige: Dans quelles conditions est-ce qu\u2019une d\u00e9cision ant\u00e9rieure de la Cour pour pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9e?","og_url":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/","og_site_name":"Alice Florian Avocate","article_published_time":"2016-06-11T14:11:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-11T13:24:11+00:00","author":"Daniel Cooper","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Daniel Cooper","Estimation du temps de lecture":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/"},"author":{"name":"Daniel Cooper","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d"},"headline":"R.P. v. R.C., [2011] 3 SCR 819, 2011 SCC 65 (CanLII)","datePublished":"2016-06-11T14:11:59+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-11T13:24:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/"},"wordCount":342,"articleSection":["Droit de la famille","Pension \u00e9poux"],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/","url":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/","name":"Droit de la famille - Kramer v Kramer","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-06-11T14:11:59+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-11T13:24:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/family-law-r-p-v-r-c-2011-3-scr-819-2011-scc-65-canlii-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R.P. v. R.C., [2011] 3 SCR 819, 2011 SCC 65 (CanLII)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/","name":"Alice Florian Avocate","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d","name":"Daniel Cooper","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Daniel Cooper"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1550","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1550"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1550\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5295,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1550\/revisions\/5295"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1550"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1550"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1550"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}