{"id":1603,"date":"2016-06-10T19:24:26","date_gmt":"2016-06-11T00:24:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/danielcooperlawyer.com\/?p=1603"},"modified":"2023-05-17T18:48:03","modified_gmt":"2023-05-17T18:48:03","slug":"1603","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/","title":{"rendered":"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Question en litige<\/strong>: Est-ce que le payeur d\u2019une pension alimentaire qui devient retrait\u00e9 est en droit de demander une r\u00e9duction de la pension alimentaire sur la base que la pension alimentaire re\u00e7ue pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment prenait en compte l\u2019\u00e9galisation des biens matrimoniaux. \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/5206\">D\u00e9cision complete<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Les faits<\/strong>: Les parties ont \u00e9t\u00e9 mari\u00e9es 36 ans.\u00a0 Lors du divorce, leurs actifs ont \u00e9t\u00e9 partag\u00e9s en part \u00e9gale, les parties recevant chacun environ 370\u00a0000\u00a0$.\u00a0 Le mari payait une pension alimentaire pour \u00e9pouse de 3\u00a0200\u00a0$ par mois.\u00a0 Toutefois, lors de la retraite du mari, il d\u00e9posa une requ\u00eate pour r\u00e9duire le montant de la pension alimentaire.\u00a0 Le juge de premi\u00e8re instance a r\u00e9duit la pension \u00e0 950\u00a0$ par mois.\u00a0 La Cour d\u2019appel de l\u2019Ontario a renvers\u00e9 la d\u00e9cision et a ordonn\u00e9 qu\u2019une pension de 2\u00a0000\u00a0$ par mois soit pay\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p><strong>D\u00e9cision<\/strong>\u00a0: La Cour Supr\u00eame du Canada a confirm\u00e9 la d\u00e9cision du juge de premi\u00e8re instance de r\u00e9duire la pension \u00e0 950 $ par mois. Elle a estim\u00e9 qu&rsquo;il est g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement injuste de permettre au r\u00e9cepteur de la pension alimentaire de r\u00e9colter le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de la pension \u00e0 la fois comme un atout, puis de nouveau en tant que source de revenu (double indemnisation). Pour \u00e9viter la double indemnisation, le tribunal devrait, lorsque c\u2019est possible, s\u2019int\u00e9resser surtout \u00e0 la portion du revenu et des biens du d\u00e9biteur qui n\u2019ont pas fait partie du partage d\u2019\u00e9galisation quand il est prouv\u00e9 que le conjoint b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire a toujours besoin d\u2019aide pour subvenir \u00e0 ses besoins. La double indemnisation ne peut pas toujours \u00eatre \u00e9vit\u00e9e et une pension de retraite qui a d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 partag\u00e9\u00a0peut \u00e9galement \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme un bien alimentaire quand le conjoint d\u00e9biteur poss\u00e8de la capacit\u00e9 de payer, quand le conjoint b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire a fait des efforts raisonnables pour utiliser les biens vis\u00e9s par l\u2019\u00e9galisation de mani\u00e8re \u00e0 produire un revenu et que, malgr\u00e9 cela, des difficult\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques d\u00e9coulant du mariage ou de sa rupture subsistent. La double indemnisation peut \u00e9galement \u00eatre autoris\u00e9e dans les ordonnances et ententes alimentaires fond\u00e9es principalement sur le besoin plut\u00f4t que sur l&rsquo;indemnisation. Dans ce cas, le montant du soutien devrait \u00eatre r\u00e9duit en fonction du changement important dans les circonstances et la capacit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e9pouse \u00e0 produire un revenu raisonnable de ses investissements.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Question en litige: Est-ce que le payeur d\u2019une pension alimentaire qui devient retrait\u00e9 est en droit de demander une r\u00e9duction de la pension alimentaire&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-droit-de-la-famille-cat","category-pension-epoux-cat"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII) | Alice Florian Avocate<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII) | Alice Florian Avocate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Question en litige: Est-ce que le payeur d\u2019une pension alimentaire qui devient retrait\u00e9 est en droit de demander une r\u00e9duction de la pension alimentaire...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Alice Florian Avocate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-11T00:24:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-17T18:48:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daniel Cooper\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daniel Cooper\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/1603\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/1603\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Daniel Cooper\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d\"},\"headline\":\"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII)\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-11T00:24:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-17T18:48:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/1603\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":418,\"articleSection\":[\"Droit de la famille\",\"Pension \u00e9poux\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/1603\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/1603\\\/\",\"name\":\"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII) | Alice Florian Avocate\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-11T00:24:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-17T18:48:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/1603\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/1603\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/1603\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Alice Florian Avocate\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawcf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d\",\"name\":\"Daniel Cooper\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Daniel Cooper\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII) | Alice Florian Avocate","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII) | Alice Florian Avocate","og_description":"Question en litige: Est-ce que le payeur d\u2019une pension alimentaire qui devient retrait\u00e9 est en droit de demander une r\u00e9duction de la pension alimentaire...","og_url":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/","og_site_name":"Alice Florian Avocate","article_published_time":"2016-06-11T00:24:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-05-17T18:48:03+00:00","author":"Daniel Cooper","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Daniel Cooper","Estimation du temps de lecture":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/"},"author":{"name":"Daniel Cooper","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d"},"headline":"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII)","datePublished":"2016-06-11T00:24:26+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-17T18:48:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/"},"wordCount":418,"articleSection":["Droit de la famille","Pension \u00e9poux"],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/","url":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/","name":"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII) | Alice Florian Avocate","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-06-11T00:24:26+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-17T18:48:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/1603\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/","name":"Alice Florian Avocate","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/58a7105ec8b06a6bd011af9824ea121d","name":"Daniel Cooper","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/45739b30b813a38d8e327825efe4a4721b323ed3def6bb97fe975be207a80f19?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Daniel Cooper"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1603"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1603\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4780,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1603\/revisions\/4780"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawcf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}